Describe what you need, choose the type of analysis, and let the agent work in the background. Receive a structured document with verifiable sources in minutes.
In-depth research on a legal topic with citations and regulatory references
Critical analysis of a legal document with improvement suggestions
Comparison between two document versions highlighting the differences
Reconstruction of the regulatory evolution of a legal institution
Compliance check against a predefined playbook
Cross-cutting analysis of a topic across multiple regulatory and case law sources
Targeted search for relevant rulings with trend analysis
Open-ended task: describe what you need and the agent decides how to proceed
Every task produces a structured memo organized by sections, with verifiable citations to legislation and case law. You can download it in Word, open it in the editor, or access it at any time.
1. Regulatory framework
The principle of binding force of contracts under Art. 1372 of the Civil Code prevents an interpretive change from retroactively affecting obligations already performed.1
Not a single agent. A team with diverse roles and personalities that analyzes the issue from multiple perspectives, debates, and produces a collegial opinion. No other product on the market offers this feature.
Just like in a real law firm, each team member has different skills and approaches. Configure roles, adjust personalities, choose which tools each agent can use.
Gathers material, compiles notes, searches through sources
Structured research, initial drafts, consistency checks
Legal strategy, in-depth analysis, innovative approaches
Supervises, evaluates the team's work, decides
Art. 1372 Civil Code: the contract has the force of law between the parties. Retroactive interpretation is limited by the principle of good faith.
Supreme Court Joint Sections no. 23601/2017 confirms that an interpretive change cannot affect concluded relationships.
More aggressive position: Art. 1362 Civil Code requires seeking common intent, which could justify a reinterpretation.
Each agent analyzes the case independently, then analyses are shared. In the second round, the team debates, proposes counterarguments, and seeks consensus. The lead partner evaluates and produces the final opinion.
Competitors offer a single agent that answers questions. edit.legal gives you 8 types of specialized tasks and a team of agents with configurable roles, personalities, and multi-round deliberation. Like having an entire law firm analyzing your case in minutes.